Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Thomas v. Newton et al
as 7:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Melvin Avon Thomas
Defendant:
Jeffery Newton and Jessica Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Newton et al
as 7:2020cv00059
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Robinson
Defendant:
Jonathan Williams and Jeffery Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2019cv00653
Plaintiff:
Albert V. Cox
Defendant:
Major Eric Young, Superintendent Jeffery Newton and Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Newton et al
as 1:2018cv00851
Defendant:
Cpl. Rideout, Chaplin Joe Collins, Officer Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00208
Petitioner:
Jeffery Newton Sharp, Jr
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gordon v. Newton et al
as 3:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
Wayne L. Gordon
Defendant:
Jeffery Newton, MoJa Motsumi and Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal Pollard v. Mr. Reynold
as 16-6318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYAL POLLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. REYNOLDS, Major/Supervisor, MR. SAPP, R.R.J. Officer, LARON DELOATCH, R.R.J. Officer and others
Pollard v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Royal Pollard
Defendant:
Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Sapp, Mr. LaRon Deloatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Green v. E. Boakye
as 15-7885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
E. BOAKYE, Medical Director Riverside Regional Jail and JEFFERY NEWTON
Defendant:
JEFFERY NEWCOME, RIVERSIDE REGIONAL JAIL, et al., VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia et al
as 3:2015cv00135
Petitioner:
Johnny R. Huff, Sr.
Respondent:
Attorney General of Virginia, Commonwealth of Virginia and Jeffery Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
