Cases 11 - 20 of 22
ZMCC, Inc. v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2015cv13804
Plaintiff:
ZMCC, Inc.
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Roderick Tucker , Jeffrey Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZMCC, Inc. d/b/a Erotic City v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2015cv13783
Plaintiff:
ZMCC, Inc. d/b/a Erotic City
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Roderick Tucker, Jeffrey Banks and others
ZMCC, Inc. d/b/a Erotic City v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2015cv13780
Plaintiff:
ZMCC, Inc. d/b/a Erotic City
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Roderick Tucker, Jeffrey Banks and others
BLALARK v. HILL et al
as 3:2015cv00872
Plaintiff:
Gary Stafford Blalark
Defendant:
Muhammed Binabdulrahi Hill, A. I. Crawford, Jeffrey Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLALARK v. HILL et al
as 2:2015cv01267
Plaintiff:
GARY STAFFORD BLALARK
Defendant:
MUHAMMED BINABDULRAHI HILL, A. I. CRAWFORD, JEFFREY BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Taylor et al
as 2:2014cv14086
Plaintiff:
Darrell Brown
Defendant:
A. Taylor, Stephen Kue , Ransom Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01615
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Banks
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brooks v. Kile et al
as 2:2011cv13519
Plaintiff:
Branden Brooks
Defendant:
Jason Kile and Jeffrey Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo et al v. Bechtel National, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00322
Plaintiff:
Jessica Acevedo , Jeffrey Banks , Melanie Bass and others
Defendant:
Bechtel National, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Acevedo et al v. Bechtel National, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04643
Plaintiff:
Jessica Acevedo , Jeffrey Banks , Melanie Bass and others
Defendant:
Bechtel National, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
