Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Illes, Sr. v. Beard et al
as 1:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Illes, Sr., M.D.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ph.D. , Dorina Varner , Ian Taggart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. Klopotoski, et al
as 10-3635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTON BOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, JERRY WALSH, VINCENT MOONEY and others
Steve Stewart, et al v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-3622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE STEWART, LAMONT C. BULLOCK, NATHAN RILEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Ph.D., JOHN PALAKOVICH, Superintendent, JAMES FOUSE, Safety Manager and others
Leroy Fears v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-2615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY FEARS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, LOUIS S. POLINO, SMITH, Officer, (First Name Unknown), Corrections Officer and others
David Wicks v. Jeffrey Beard
as 10-2510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, PH.D. The Department of Corrections
Brown v. Beard et al
as 4:2010cv01129
Plaintiff:
Keith Stanley Brown
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ph.D., Richard Ellers, Raymond Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Curtis Diggs, et al
as 09-4213
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CURTIS DIGGS, also known as WILLIAM C. DIGGS
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, PH.D. SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Gregory Stover, et al v. Thomas Dohman, et al
as 09-3240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY STOVER
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DOHMAN, MCCUSKER, Correction Officer, (1st NAME UNKNOWN), CUDDERBACH, (1ST NAME UNKNOWN) and others
Davis v. Beard
as 1:2009cv01411
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
