Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rodriguez v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Rodriguez
Respondent:
John Henley and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07140
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46950
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv11925
Defendant:
Luis Ramos, The City Of New York,, NYPD Detective John Slater, Shield # 6994 and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherwood et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2019cv06605
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation, Village Of Oak Park, Eric Elkins and others
Plaintiff:
John Sherwood and Tomasz Stacha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. Ferranto et al
as 3:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Transfer Coordinator, Sgt. Bebout, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Accardo et al v. Kingdon of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11314
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Smith, Zulma Candelario, Norman Green and others
Defendant:
Kingdon of Saudi Arabia
Petitioner:
Darryl Adone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
RODRIGUEZ et al v. BOHANAN
as 2:2018cv03054
Defendant:
BRIAN PAUL BOHANAN
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RODRIGUEZ and SUZANNA VOROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
