Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Elmore v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Ashley King, Shrika Green, Mary Mena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Cooksie et al
as 4:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Lanika Cooksie, Shelby Huston, John Brazzeale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Richardson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Elmore v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Jane Robinson, Lindsy Hill, Francis Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fountain v. Southwest Funding LP et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
April Fountain
Defendant:
Southwest Funding LP, Ginnie Mae, Mortgage Electronic Registration System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Meyers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Meyers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Elmore v. Does
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Payne
as 6:2024cv06031
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Watkins
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elmore v. Hurst et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Thomas Hurst, Claudia Harris and Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Hurst et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Thomas Hurst, Claudia Harris, John Burcham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
