Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014bk00066
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Ana Vasquez-De Lopez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60467
Petitioner:
ANA DELMI VASQUEZ-DE LOPEZ, JENNIFER LISSETH LOPEZ-VASQUEZ and SANTOS DE JESUS LOPEZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv03590
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Y. Lopez, Jaen E. Lopez and Julia B. Lopez
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Lopez v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv02653
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Lopez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jennifer Roberta Lopez v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2012cv04789
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Roberta Lopez
Arrechea-Martinez v. Holder
as 12-1314
Petitioner:
Jennifer Andrea Arrechea-Martinez, AKA Jennifer Daniella Lopez-Juarez Martinez
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Lopez v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2011cv02226
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Lopez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jennifer Anabelle Lopez Gonzalez
as 2:2009cr01005
Defendant:
Jennifer Anabelle Lopez Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
USA
Tijerina et al v. Ryland Homes of Texas, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01390
Plaintiff:
Theresa Tijerina and Jennifer Narvaez-Lopez
Defendant:
Ryland Homes of Texas, Inc. and The Ryland Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv00337
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Lopez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
