Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis #223815 v. Bailey et al
as 1:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Davis #223815
Defendant:
Jennifer Bailey, Emileigh Neve and Wayne Devenbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Dortch et al
as 3:2019cv00875
Defendant:
Fred Cowgill, WIKY, Vicki Dortch and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Deshawn M. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Monroe et al
as 1:2019cv00532
Defendant:
Jennifer Bailey and Amy Monroe
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Watkins v. WLKY
as 3:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Fred Cowgill, Vicki Dortch, Morgan Lentes and others
Plaintiff:
Gene DeShawn M. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unimerica Insurance Company v. Miller et al
as 5:2013cv01373
Plaintiff:
Unimerica Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mary Noel Miller, Jacqueline J Miller-Wagenknecht, Mary Jo Nicol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Adams et al v. Sapphire Mining, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Adams , Donald Adams , Lennie Gale Adams and others
Defendant:
Sapphire Coal Company , United Coal Company, LLC , Unknown Agents of Sapphire Mining, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bailey v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al
as 1:2007oe40000
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bailey and Jennifer Bailey
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
