Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HEBERT v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18212
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HEBERT
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dannon Sellers v. J. Haney, et al
as 15-30632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNON KEITH SELLERS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. PHIL HANEY, RENEE LOUVIERE, ANGELA ODINET and others
Frickey et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02698
Plaintiff:
Keith James Frickey , Eleanore Frickey , Cathy Matherne and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sellers v. Haney et al
as 6:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Dannon Keith Sellers
Defendant:
J Phil Haney, Renee Louviere, Angela Odinet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEBERT et al v. IWASAKI et al
as 2:2014cv08108
Defendant:
Sherri R. Carter, Children's Law Center of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HEBERT, GEORGE WIENCKOWSKI and Angela Wienckowski
Jennifer Hebert et al v. Bruce Iwasaki et al
as 2:2014cv08095
Defendant:
Sherri R. Carter, Children's Law Center of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hebert, Angela Wienckowski and George Wienckowski
Hebert v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv10893
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hebert
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dangerfield et al v. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07067
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Dangerfield, Lonnie Ray, Kyle Dulcuze and others
Defendant:
Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc, Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
