Cases 11 - 20 of 142
John Ross v. Greg Rechcigl, et al
as 22-3065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John D. Ross
Defendant / Appellee:
Greg Rechcigl, Health Services Administrator, EARU, Tammy Kimble, Assistant Health Services Administrator, EARU, Gary Kerstein, Doctor, EARU and others
BISHOP v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ANDREW BISHOP
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP, INC., J. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14349
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ANDREW HALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13854
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ANDREW SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunahue v. Reed et al
as 4:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Marshall Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Kenneth Starks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Michael McCormack
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reid, Jeremy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSHROE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03096
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Bushroe
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall D Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Smith v. Jeremy Andrews, et al
as 21-3356
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John J. Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeremy Andrews, Warden, EARU, ADC, James Dycus, Warden, EARU, ADC, Emmer Branch, Deputy Warden, EARU, ADC and others
Jackson v. Lay et al
as 2:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson and Arkansas Board of Correction
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Michael Richardson, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
