Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bargo v. Kelley et al
as 5:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jerome Allen Bargo
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley , Correct Care Solutions, Steven Stringfellow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bargo v. Naylor et al
as 5:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jerome Allen Bargo
Defendant:
Raymond Naylor, Randy Watson, Jeremy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Bargo, et al v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 15-1984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerome Allen Bargo, and all other similarly situated inmates and Robert Harold Munnerlyn, and all other similarly situated inmates
Plaintiff:
Marion Gene Westerman, and all other similarly situated inmates
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelly, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Randall Watson, Warden, Varner Unit, Jeremy Andrews, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit and others
Bargo et al v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00393
Plaintiff:
Jerome Allen Bargo, Marion Gene Westerman and Robert Harold Munnerlyn
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Randall Watson, Jeremy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Bargo v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-2640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerome Allen Bargo
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry May, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelley, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Bargo v. Kelly et al
as 5:2014cv00078
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Randy Watson, Cheryl Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Allen Bargo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bargo v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jerome Allen Bargo
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bargo v. Kelly et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Jerome Allen Bargo
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Larry May, James Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
