Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Davis v. Calderon
as 3:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Dwan Jerome Davis
Defendant:
Officer T. J. Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Kelly et al
as 6:2021cv02394
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Davis
Defendant:
Dennis Kelly, Lonnie Smith, Chris Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Jerome Davis
as 21-4217
Defendant / Appellant:
JEROME DAVIS, a/k/a Jerome Salathiel Davis, a/k/a Rome
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Jerome Davis Kent
as 21-1885
Defendant / Appellant:
Jerome Davis Kent
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Shaw et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, Sheriff John Wilcher, Dr. Vlasenko and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Kirkland, Michael Green, Rashad Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jerome Davis
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center and Sheriff John Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Sumner et al
as 8:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Anna Sumner, Kay Williams, Donald B Hocker and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74493
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16220
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JEROME DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. CONAGRA FOODS INC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2020cv00100
Defendant:
SEDGWICK, CONAGRA FOODS, INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE and CONAGRA FOODS INC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE JEROME DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
