Cases 1 - 10 of 55
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24375
Plaintiff:
JEROME HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Stanley Harris
as 23-4460
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STANLEY JEROME HARRIS
Harris v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
Jerome Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04669
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JEROME HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strober v. Harris
as 1:2022mi00057
Plaintiff:
Rashida Strober
Defendant:
Thomas Jerome Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Harris v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02121
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Jerome Harris
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARMICHAEL, JR. et al v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
A. Offord Carmichael, REV. A. OFFORD CARMICHAEL, JR. and REV. DIANE CONLEY
Defendant:
Jerome Harris, African Methodist Episcopal Church, African Methodist Episcopal Church Ministerial Retirement Annuity Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Harris v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. et al
as 4:2021cv09570
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Harris
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. and Vancouver Toyota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Door Dash, Inc.
as 3:2021cv09445
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Harris and Kevin Jerome Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Door Dash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
USA v. Jerome Harris, Jr.
as 21-10337
Defendant / Appellant:
JEROME HARRIS, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
