Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Mendez v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00868
Petitioner:
Jesse Mendez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alderete-Lopez v. Whitiker et al
as 1:2018cv01114
Respondent:
John Whitiker, Kirstjen Nielsen and Jesse Mendez
Petitioner:
Jose Alderete-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mendez v. Chang et al
as 2:2018cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mendez
Defendant:
P Chang, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Amicus Curiae:
Office Of The Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Velasquez, et al v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al
as 18-40140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS VELASQUEZ and HERLINDA VELASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, MARIO ORTIZ, District Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Abdullah v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
Abdulrahman A. Abdullah
Defendant:
Mario Ortiz, Jesse Mendez, Hector Balderas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Omari v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Hussein Al-Omari
Defendant:
Mario Ortiz, Jesse Mendez, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez et al v. South San Antonio Independent School District
as 5:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mendez
Defendant:
South San Antonio Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Velasquez et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Velasquez and Herlinda Velasquez
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Mario Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cheryle Ann Robbins v. Zenith American Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04939
Defendant:
David Allen, David Allen, Jaime Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryle Ann Robbins
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
