Cases 1 - 8 of 8
KEEL v. DIRECT EXPRESS BANK FRAUD SERVICES DEPARTMENT
as 2:2019cv03813
Plaintiff:
JESSIE LEE KEEL, III
Defendant:
DIRECT EXPRESS BANK FRAUD SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessie Lee Stoddard-Nunez v. City of Hayward, et al
as 18-16403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSIE LEE JETMORE STODDARD-NUNEZ, individually and as the successor-in-interest of Shawn Joseph Jetmore Stoddard-Nunez
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HAYWARD, a municipal entity and MANUEL TROCHE, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Hayward
Howell v. Underwood et al
as 3:2018cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
William Jordan Underwood, Michael Cody, Kim T Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose v. The City of Utica
as 18-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christine Almas Rose, individually and as mother of Jessie Lee Rose
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Michael J. Rose, individually and as father of Jessie Lee Rose, and as the administrator of the estate of Jessie Lee Rose
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
City of Utica and Officer Anthony Ellis, individually and as a police officer of the City of Utica
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Utica Police Department
Lee v. Emmanuel
as 1:2017cv01318
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee
Defendant:
Rahm Emmanuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00794
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
Inge P Johnson, Gary W. Alverson and Jacqueline M. Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freshwater v. Mayor et al
as 1:2016cv00269
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Freshwater
Defendant:
Mayor, Chief and Jay Mitchener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Southern Eagle Distributing, Inc.
as 2:2013cv14086
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Washington, jr
Defendant:
Southern Eagle Distributing, Inc. and John Doe Companies 1-5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
