Cases 21 - 30 of 33
USA v. Francisco Trevino-Rodriguez
as 11-40662
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO TREVINO-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Francisco de Jesus Trevino
Jesus Trevino v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-51101
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESUS TREVINO
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv61419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Trevino v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00381
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Rick C. Thaler
Petitioner:
Jesus Trevino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trevino v. Thaler
as 5:2010cv00289
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Rick C. Thaler
Petitioner:
Jesus Trevino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trevino v. Benton County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2009cv05143
Plaintiff:
Jesus Trevino
Defendant:
Benton County, Arkansas, Corey Coggin, Travis Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Benton County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2009cv00488
Plaintiff:
Jesus Trevino
Defendant:
Benton County, Arkansas, Corey Coggin, Travis Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guzman et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2009cv01848
Plaintiff:
Rosa Guzman and Jesus Trevino
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Mark Leathers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Trevino v. Hendren et al
as 5:2009cv05064
Plaintiff:
Jesus Trevino
Defendant:
Jimm Larry Hendren, Michael Bose and Toby Reely
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States v. Jesus Trevino
as 09-1444
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jesus Trevino, also known as Adalid Montiel-Figueroa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
