Cases 21 - 30 of 33
B et al v. JetBlue Airways Corp
as 3:2015cv01171
Plaintiff:
K. B. and Everald Brown
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gorbonosova et al v. Aeroflot Russian Airlines et al
as 1:2013cv04175
Plaintiff:
Svetlana Gorbonosova and Dmitry Gorbonosov
Defendant:
Aeroflot Russian Airlines and Jetblue Airways Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Vaughn-Moore v. Jetblue Airways Corp.
as 1:2012cv04672
Defendant:
Jetblue Airways Corp.
Plaintiff:
Monica Vaughn-Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Thomas Foley, et al v. Jetblue Airways Corp.
as 11-17128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS FOLEY, VITA ZAVOLI, LILLIAN SCAIFE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP.
CHISHOLM v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv01564
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA CHISHOLM
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. and ABC COMPANY (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Condatis LLC v. A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S et al
as 6:2010cv00600
Plaintiff:
Condatis LLC
Defendant:
A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, ABB, Inc., ABB, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Foley et al v. Jetblue Airways Corp.
as 3:2010cv03882
Plaintiff:
Thomas Foley , Vita Zavoli , Lillian Scaife and others
Defendant:
Jetblue Airways Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendez v. JetBlue Airways Corp
as 3:2010cv00837
Plaintiff:
Serafin Mendez
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROUSSET et al v. AROKIUM et al
as 2:2010cv00740
Plaintiff:
GINA ROUSSET and ROBERT ROUSSET
Defendant:
DAYNE G. AROKIUM, JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP., JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
