Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07846
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Lin et al v. Municipality of Culebra et al
as 3:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Jia Lin, Nelson Yi, Eugenia Yi and others
Defendant:
Municipality of Culebra, Autoridad de Conservacion y Desarrollo de Culebra, MAPFRE PRAICO Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Weng et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv03721
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, David Roark and Leon Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Li Jia Lin and Zhen Weng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Wu (Chen)
as 13-4013
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lin Wu, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Ying Chen, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, AKA Jessica, Ze Yu Zhu, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, AKA Jie Yu and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Yu Chen, AKA Sealed Defendant 11, AKA Cantonese Guy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00094
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lin et al v. Caterisano et al
as 8:2007cv01984
Plaintiff:
Jia Lin and Wenle Wang
Defendant:
Richard C. Caterisano, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
