Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY, $34,760.00 IN U.S. et al
as 1:2019cv00186
Defendant:
2015 BMW428i, VIN WBA4A5C57FD410683, 2004 LEXUS RX330, VIN JTJHA31U240021955, CURRENCY, $34,760.00 IN U.S. and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
JIA LIU
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
ProCraft Cabinetry, Inc. v. Sweet Home Kitchen and Bath, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01392
Plaintiff:
ProCraft Cabinetry, Inc.
Defendant:
Sweet Home Kitchen and Bath, Inc. , ProCraft Cabinetry Florida, LLC , ProCraft Cabinetry Dallas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04734
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
