Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PC)Rivas v. Cook
as 1:2021cv01007
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivas
Defendant:
Jim Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Rivas v. Jim Cook, et al
as 21-15559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL RIVAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER WALSH, District Attorney of Fresno County and JIM COOK, Premier Cellular Mapping and Analysis Expert
Rivas v. Cook et al
as 1:2020cv01484
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivas
Defendant:
Jim Cook and Christopher Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Carla Robertson, et al
as 20-16103
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID Y. IGE, GREG SUSEL, JIM COOKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Grandinetti v. Robertson et al
as 1:2020cv00180
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti and State of Hawaii exilee
Defendant:
Susan Murray, Norman Carrier, CHPD and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38315
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JIM COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Underwood et al
as 3:2018cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
William Jordan Underwood, Michael Cody, Kim T Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Johnson et al.
as 2:2015cv02569
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Kevin Johnson, David Serna, Scott R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Jim Cook, Ruth Naglich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Swenson v. Siskiyou County, et al
as 11-16678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY SWENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SISKIYOU COUNTY, SISKIYOU COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, LAVADA ERICKSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
