Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Carino v. Namoo HD, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01815
Defendant:
Archanaben Thakore, Jong Jin Kim, Shree Laxmipati, Inc. doing business as Riggs Grocery and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Lucero Carino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
KIM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07041
Petitioner:
EUI KIM and EUI JIN KIM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Franco Martinez v. JB Raw Raw Corp d/b/a Raw Raw Farm et al
as 1:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Franco Martinez
Defendant:
JB Raw Raw Corp d/b/a Raw Raw Farm and Hyoung Jin Kim
TERRANOVA v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04685
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND TERRANOVA, ERIC KING, WILLIE COLE WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Terranova et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Raymond Terranova, Eric King, Willie Cole Williams and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Kim v. Maha, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
Hyun Jin Kim
Defendant:
Maha, Inc. and Bong Hee Ma
GOODMAN et al v. 476 K, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03383
Plaintiff:
SARAIAH GOODMAN, BERNIS YUKSEKGONULK, BEVERLY FLETCHER and others
Defendant:
476 K, LLC, ANTONIOS CAVASILIOS, ANDRE DE MOYA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Torres v. RNK Jewelry, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00195
Defendant:
Jin Kim and RNK Jewelry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
