Cases 1 - 10 of 762
United States v. Randall Haggart
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randall Joe Haggart, also known as Randall Jo Haggart
Beil v. Fischer et al
as 4:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
James Beil
Defendant:
Jo Leigh Fischer and Lynn M Stoppy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nie v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jo Nie
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Harenza v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05023
Plaintiff:
Theresa Jo Harenza
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Debi Jo Anderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BMO Bank NA v. Hometown Plastics LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A., Bank of the West and BMO Bank NA
Defendant:
Hometown Plastics LLC, Sara Jo Peridore, Rick Dean Peridore, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wilson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Wilson and Bobbie Jo Wilson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corp, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Shepard v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Brittany Jo Shepard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hennessy v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jo-Anna Hennessy
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jackson v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv03827
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and Jo Ann Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
