Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Adkins et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2021cv01818
Plaintiff:
Melinda Adkins, Gerald Ed Andrews, Estate of Rich Romer and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Monsanto Company, Solutia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUMULTY v. BARBER et al
as 3:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
KATHY TUMULTY
Defendant:
MARY JO BARBER , STEVEN GLUNT and DUANE HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, KENNETH CAMERON, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bob King v. Steven Glunt, et al
as 13-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOB KING
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN GLUNT, Superintendent, JENNERFER ROSSMAN, Unit Manager at SCI Houtzdale, CO 1 HENRY, Unit Manager at SCI Houtzdale and others
KING v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
BOB KING
Defendant:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, JENNERFER ROSSMAN, HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Bricker v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 10-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, FRED J. RUFFO, WILLIAM AYERS and others
Ronald Bricker v. Turner, et al, et al
as 10-2275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
TURNER, RANDALL E. BRITTON, C. SMITH and others
Bricker v. Turner et al
as 1:2010cv00479
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Turner, Randall E. Britton, C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. BRITTON et al
as 3:2010cv00057
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAVIS
Respondent:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, JEFFREY A. BEARD, MARY JO BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRICKER v. BRITTON et al
as 3:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, MARY JO BARBER, SARGENT NEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
