Cases 1 - 10 of 556
Fuentes v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Joe Fuentes
Defendant:
Warden, Medical Providers and Transportation Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC v. CDG ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC
Defendant:
CDG ENTERPRISES, LLC doing business as 5TH AVENUE GRILL & BAR, JEFFREY DEES, JOSHUA GOODIN and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
Taebel v. Biden
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carswell v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Defendant:
Jeanie Buss, Ron Neal, Buss and others
Plaintiff:
Marven T Carswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
BETHANY MARELL
Defendant:
OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUCH v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. COUCH
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, UNIGOV, MARION COUNTY INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. HOGSETT et al
as 1:2023cv02294
Plaintiff:
RYANT FORD
Defendant:
JOE HOGSETT, RANDELL TAYLOR, KERRY FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMBEL v. MERSHON
as 1:2023cv02231
Plaintiff:
JOE HAMBEL
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
