Cases 61 - 70 of 139
COE v CHAPMAN
as 3:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CHRISTOPHER COE
Defendant:
JOE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony of Lowery Family et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv03175
Plaintiff:
Anthony of Lowrey Family and Anthony Blake Lowrey Estate Trust
Defendant:
United States of America, Walton County, Samuel D. Ozburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
JOHNSON v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
TRACY EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOE CHAPMAN, WILLIAMS, LISA DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowery v. Walton County et al
as 1:2015cv04199
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blake Lowery
Defendant:
Walton County, Ozburn, Samuel D. Ozburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Craig
as 4:2015cv00423
Petitioner:
Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent:
Dan Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapman v. Parry-Jones et al
as 1:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Belinda Parry-Jones, James McKinney, Steve Zdrazil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Iowa Medical and Classification Center et al
as 4:2015cv00312
Petitioner:
Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent:
Iowa Medical and Classification Center and Pottawattamie County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapman v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2015cv00296
Petitioner:
Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent:
State of Iowa and Warden Iowa Medical and Classification Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapman v. Sosa-Gayton et al
as 8:2015cv00304
Defendant:
All of the Douglas County Public Defenders Office in Omaha, Nebraska, Douglas County, NE, Tim Burns and Yvonne D. Sosa-Gayton
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Craig
as 8:2015cv00267
Petitioner:
Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent:
Dan Craig
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
