Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Charles Wideman v. City of Morgan Hill, et al
as 13-17452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES WIDEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MORGAN HILL, in its official and municipal capacity, CITY OF MORGAN HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its official and municipal capacity, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, in its municipal capacity and others
Phelps et al v. Powers et al
as 1:2013cv00011
Defendant:
Drue Powers, Joe Sampson and Ralph O'Donnell
Plaintiff:
Margie J. Phelps , Elizabeth M. Phelps and Timothy B. Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wideman v. City of Morgan Hill et al
as 5:2012cv05530
Plaintiff:
Charles Wideman
Defendant:
City of Morgan Hill, City of Morgan Hill Police Department (CMHPD), County of Santa Clara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald Johnson v. Ronald Neiman, et al
as 11-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald E. Johnson, also known as Donald E. Cooley
Defendant - Appellee:
Ronald C. Neiman, Constituent Services Officer, Personal Capacity, also known as Chris Neiman, Lois Cella, Nurse, CMS, Personal Capacity, Brenda Burlbow, Nurse, CMS, Farmington Correctional Center, Personal Capacity and others
Mohammed et al v. City of Morgan Hill et al
as 5:2010cv05630
Plaintiff:
Abduraham Mohammed and Jinow Gudal
Defendant:
City of Morgan Hill, City of Morgan Hill Police Department (CMHPD), County of Santa Clara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Neiman et al
as 4:2009cv00689
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Neiman, Lois Cella, Brenda Burlbow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampson v. Quarterman
as 4:2008mc00540
Petitioner:
Donnie Joe Sampson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Jackie Walker, et al v. Gary B. Kempker, et al
as 06-2014
Plaintiff:
Ollie Williams, James Vitale and Timothy N. Davis
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jackie Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
Gary B. Kempker, Dora B. Schriro, I. Grimes and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
