Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Sergio Jacobo Ramos v. The State of California et al
as 2:2015cv05511
Respondent:
Warden John Jane Doe and The State of California
Petitioner:
Sergio Jacobo Ramos
VILLANEVA v. COMM. OF PA. et al
as 2:2014cv06496
Petitioner:
RICKY VILLANEVA
Respondent:
COMM. OF PA., DEPT. OF CORR., JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drew, Rex v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2014cv00565
Petitioner:
Rex Alvin Drew
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin , Sauk County, Chip Meisters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Holder et al
as 2:2012cv01262
Petitioner:
Osmond Wayne Davis
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , JOHN MORTON , JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv00817
Petitioner:
Osmond Wayne Davis
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , John Morton , Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chambers v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 1:2012cv00201
Petitioner:
Lorenzo L. Chambers
Respondent:
John/Jane Doe, John Doe and Erica Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv04449
Petitioner:
LARRY MILLER, LEROY KNIGHT and LEONARD SWANSON
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PAULA DOW, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. FCI Butner - 2 et al
as 5:2011hc02059
Petitioner:
Divine Washington
Respondent:
FCI Butner - 2 and John- Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Griffin v. LNU (1) et al
as 5:2011cv03064
Petitioner:
Eric Griffin
Respondent:
FNU LNU (1), Department of Justice, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ruggiero v. Obama et al
as 3:2010cv00555
Petitioner:
Christopher Ruggiero
Respondent:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Channing D. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
