Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Anson Chi v. John Doe
as 16-10584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANSON CHI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN #1 DOE, et al
Richard Jennings v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 16-40665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Unit Warden, JOHN #2 DOE, Shift Sergeant, JANE DOE, I, Female Texas Department of Criminal Justice Officer and others
King v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2016cv04016
Plaintiff:
Domintric King
Defendant:
Anita Alvarez, Robert Kowalski, John #1 Doe and others
Movant:
Anthony Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn-Turner v. Doll et al
as 3:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
Evans A Wynn-Turner
Defendant:
Clair Doll, Brittney O'Brien, Jeff Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler Provance v. Holbrook et al
as 4:2015cv05115
Plaintiff:
Bryce Leroy Spangler Provance
Defendant:
Donald Holbrook, Charles Pease, Sundberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayorga v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv08044
Plaintiff:
Antonio Mayorga
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv06307
Plaintiff:
Naphtali Miller
Defendant:
John #1 Doe and John #2 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdus-Shahid Ali v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 15-1287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Former Director, Bureau of Prisons, Juan D. Castillo, Warden, USMCFP and others
Darnell Baldwin v. David Abston, et al
as 14-60576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ABSTON, Pickens County Alabama Sheriff, KEITH COX, Pickens County Sheriff Det., JOHN MCBRIDE, Pickens County Sheriff Det. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
