Cases 41 - 50 of 212
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18645
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN C LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macas et al v. K.Y. Young, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03244
Defendant:
John Doe Lee, Kyung Soon Yi, K.Y. Young, Inc. doing business as Dolce Spa NYC and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Jerez and Mayra Joana Macas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv20312
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN PILOT LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francisco Fernando-Mateo v. John Lee
as 20-3294
Interested Party:
CHAD F. WOLF, BILL PRIM, ROBERT GUADIAN and others
Respondent:
JOHN Z. LEE
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO FERNANDO-MATEO
E-Corp v. Pacificspan LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01997
Defendant:
John J Lee and Pacificspan LLC
Plaintiff:
E-Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Gastelo
as 3:2020cv05387
Petitioner:
John Henry Lee
Respondent:
Josie Gastelo and Warden Josie Gastelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cabrera et al v. Lee et al
as 1:2020cv02213
Plaintiff:
Nancy Pavia and Wendy Cabrera
Defendant:
John H. Lee, DAHT World Inc, DAHT World Inc jointlyand severally. doing business as SHEEC and others
LEE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv05304
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN E LEE and JOHN ERNEST LEE AND CHARLENE ELAINE LEE FAMILY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Stephen Yagman v. Eric Michael Garcetti et al
as 2:2020cv02722
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Defendant:
Adel H. Hagekhalil, Mike Davis, Michael N. Feuer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
