Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Porter v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina State University et al
as 5:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Porter
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of North Carolina State University, Mr. W. Randolph Woodson, Mary Ann Danowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 3.534 Acres, +/-, in Johnston Cty, NC, PIN 09-H-15-054, Described as Property of Frances C. Lee in DB 4360, P 850, Instr. No. 2013399204, Last Will/Testament of Frances Carroll Lee found as 13-E-009 et al
as 5:2018cv00365
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.534 Acres, +/-, in Johnston Cty, NC, PIN 09-H-15-054, Described as Property of Frances C. Lee in DB 4360, P 850, Instr. No. 2013399204, Last Will/Testament of Frances Carroll Lee found as 13-E-009 and John Max Lee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Devonwood-Loch Lomond Lake Association Inc et al v. City of Fayetteville et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 5:18-CV-270-H.
as 4:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Devonwood-Loch Lomond Lake Association Inc , Arran Lake Homeowners Association Inc , Rayconda Homeowners Association Inc and others
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville and City of Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devonwood-Loch Lomond Lake Association Inc et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Dianna M Pike, Gerald L Ellison, Arran Lake Homeowners Association Inc and others
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville and City of Fayetteville Public Works Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. USA
as 5:2016cv00420
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Curtis Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee, Jr. v. Pichulo et al
as 1:2009cv00652
Defendant:
Paul William Pichulo and WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff:
John L Lee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
