Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Barnes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al (Citrus County)
as 5:2020cv00004
Petitioner:
John Alexander Barnes, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al (Citrus County)
as 8:2019cv03168
Petitioner:
John Alexander Barnes, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2017cv00677
Petitioner:
Walton John Alexander
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2017cv00440
Petitioner:
Walton John Alexander
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alexander v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2016cv01062
Petitioner:
Walton John Alexander
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Alexander Riccardi v. Jerome Price
as 2:2016cv07806
Respondent:
Jerome Price
Petitioner:
John Alexander Riccardi
Parker v. Mississippi
as 1:2015cv00226
Plaintiff:
John Alexander Parker
Defendant:
Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Alexander Parker
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SNYDER v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WARREN CO., PA. et al
as 1:2012cv00220
Petitioner:
JOHN ALEXANDER SNYDER
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WARREN CO., PA. and ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Quarterman
as 08-10842
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTON JOHN ALEXANDER
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
