Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC. et al v. BARRY et al
as 1:2020cv00699
Defendant:
JOHN BARRY, JR., MRS. JOHN BARRY, JR., AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
BARRY v. KOSKINEN et al
as 3:2018cv14276
Respondent:
MARY ANN ACONE, ELBA Y. PORRATADORIA, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN and others
Petitioner:
JOHN BARRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BRILEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2018cv03259
Petitioner:
JOHN BARRY BRILEY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CANTONI v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv07893
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CANTONI
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JOHN BARRY, BRAD PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRY et al v. POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00910
Defendant:
POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC, POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC. and ABC SELLERS/LESSORS/AUTHORIZED DEALERS
Plaintiff:
BARRY, JOHN BARRY and SANDRA BARRY
Special Master:
THOMAS BLEWITT
Consolidated Plaintiff:
JOHN JAMES BARRY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PREMIUM SPORTS INC. v. GALLAGHER et al
as 2:2012cv03842
Plaintiff:
PREMIUM SPORTS INC.
Defendant:
VINCE GALLAGHER , BERNARD J. BOYCE , NANCY CANTWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Theron v. The County of York et al
as 3:2011cv01550
Plaintiff:
John Theron
Defendant:
The County of York, Doug Hoke, Mary Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CINTRON v. BARRY et al
as 2:2007cv03860
Plaintiff:
IVAN CINTRON
Defendant:
JOHN BARRY, ED KETROW and CLIFF BREARMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. BARRY et al
as 2:2007cv03862
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOHN BARRY, ED KETROW and CLIFF BREARMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
