Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Ward v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Bruce Ward
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelley, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Wallace et al
as 4:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Matthew W Barnett
Defendant:
James Wallace, John Felts, Jenny Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff v. Rousey et al
as 4:2016cv00807
Plaintiff:
Belynda Faye Goff
Defendant:
Archie L Rousey, Carroll County Sheriff's Department, Robert Gregory Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Carpenter et al
as 4:2016cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Berry
Defendant:
Abraham Carpenter, James Wallace, John Belken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Kelly et al
as 5:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly , John Felts, Dawne Vandiver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Isaac M McDonald
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Roland Anderson, Dorothy Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Travis Hill
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy Barnes v. AR Department of Corrections, et al
as 11-3810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Guy Clayton Barnes
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Danny Burl, originally sued as Burls, John Belken, originally sued as Belkens and others
Dale Cristee v. John Belken, et al
as 11-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Cristee
Defendant - Appellee:
John Belken, member of the Arkansas Parole Board, Richard Mays, Jr., member of the Arkansas Parole Board, Lynn Story, member of the Arkansas Parole Board and others
McCarver v. Ball et al
as 2:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jesse Earl McCarver
Defendant:
T Ball, John Belken, MacNerry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
