Cases 1 - 10 of 47
USA v. Shelton Benoite
as 23-12467
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHELTON JOHN BENOITE
Benoite v. USA
as 7:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Shelton John Benoite
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Shelton Benoite
as 23-11202
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHELTON JOHN BENOITE
Benoit v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02123
Plaintiff:
John Benoit
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, John Doe and Jim Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Benoite v. Cioli et al
as 3:2021cv50436
Petitioner:
Shelton John Benoite
Respondent:
A. Cioli and SMU Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benoit v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2021cv01887
Plaintiff:
Nicholas John Benoit
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Lafourche Parish, Lafourche Parish Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Snyder v. County of Riverside, et al
as 20-55347
Defendant / Appellee:
LETICIA MEEK, Registered Nurse, Individual, BOB BUSTER, Board of Supervisor, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH MCNAMARA, Captain - Jail Commander, an individual and others
Defendant:
J. DOE, #3, Captain, J. DOE, #2, Office Assistant, J. DOE, #4, Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA FRANKLIN SNYDER
Benoite v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv00141
Petitioner:
Shelton John Benoite
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Paul Dunfee v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2018cv02184
Defendant:
Jeff Stone, Riverside County Sheriff Department, William Di Yorio and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Dunfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Issler, Jr. v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2018cv01020
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, John Benoit, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Issler, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
