Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Conti v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv14382
Plaintiff:
John Conti
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Conti v. Citizens Bank, N.A.
as 22-1770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CONTI, on behlaf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Conti v. Citizens Bank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
John Conti
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONTI et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv03207
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONTI and SANDRA CONTI
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abarca et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv00947
Plaintiff:
Eunice Gomez, Jean L. Davis, Monica Arce and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
MATHEWS v. JOHN CONTI COFFEE CO. et al
as 4:2014cv00044
Defendant:
BUNN-O-MATIC CORPORATION and JOHN CONTI COFFEE CO.
Plaintiff:
SHELBY MATHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Conti Coffee Company v. Mapco Express, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
John Conti Coffee Company
Defendant:
Mapco Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
John Conti Coffee Co. v. Texas International Property Associates et al
as 3:2008cv00593
Plaintiff:
John Conti Coffee Co.
Defendant:
Texas International Property Associates and Joey Dauben
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carroll et al v. HCA Health Services of Oklahoma Inc
as 5:2008cv00614
Plaintiff:
Frank Carroll, Peter Marquis, Mark Stotts and others
Defendant:
HCA Health Services of Oklahoma Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
