Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Caphart v. Crow (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00722
Defendant:
John Crow
Plaintiff:
Johnny F. Caphart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lancaster v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Martha Lancaster
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Monica McCoy, John Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Defoe v. Crowe et al
as 5:2024cv01159
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The and John Crowe
Petitioner:
Derrick Lynn Defoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00519
Defendant:
John Crow, Pamela Harris, Wendy Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Keshon Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Crow et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and John Crow
Petitioner:
Renard L Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steward v. Crow
as 4:2023cv01673
Petitioner:
Randy Andrial Steward
Respondent:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Hall v. Warden, et al
as 23-13485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD JOE HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, JEFFERSON S. DUNN, Prison Commissioner and his cabinet personnel, SHERRY PRICE, Assistant Prison Comm. and others
Ramey v. Fair et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Officer Fair and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
