Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Brisco v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
Steshawn Brisco
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Does & Jane Does, J. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17591
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL, SGT. ILIDIO FEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv17592
Defendant:
P.O. JOANNA LOPEZ, JOHN DOE POLICE, SGT. RICHARD FLOUNOY, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM L BRYANT and RAHEEM BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv02288
Defendant:
DETECTIVE KEVIN DUFFY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEE MARRERO and others
Plaintiff:
LESTER HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Podkulski v. Taylor et al
as 1:2019cv00734
Defendant:
Jane Doe Nurse 2, John Doe Sgt 2, John Doe Med Tech 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Podkulski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Antonio v. Kolbo et al
as 3:2018cv00385
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Smith
Defendant:
Kolbo , John Doe Officers, John Doe Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jovan Battle v. State of Illinois, et al
as 18-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOVAN MIGUEL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, JOHN DOE, Sgt.(3-11 shift), RANDY PFISTER and others
CUNEO v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD et al
as 1:2017cv05215
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES CUNEO
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD, SAMUEL DISIMONE, JAMES A CREEDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUNEO v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD et al
as 1:2017cv05213
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES CUNEO
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST DEPTFORD, SAMUEL DISIMONE, JAMES A CREEDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Godinez et al
as 1:2016cv03020
Plaintiff:
Terry Wagner
Defendant:
SA. Godinez, David Gomez, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
