Cases 41 - 50 of 309
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Galvin Jr. v. Cecil County Detention Center, et al
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Cecil County Detention Center, Sheriff Scott Adams, Major Mary Allen and others
Plaintiff:
William H. Galvin Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
AMA Systems, LLC et al v. 3B Tech, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01472
Defendant:
Pro-Com Products, Inc., Brett Barbour, Salusen, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bluemar Promotions, AMA Systems, LLC and Bluemar Promotions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Tillery v. Baltimore City et al
as 1:2021cv01067
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police Department, Lower Chicester Township Police Department, Baltimore City Baltimore City and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriella Tillery, as Guardian to Genevive Marullo, and Carter Marullo and Gabriella Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01564
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ferrara v. Pallominy et al
as 8:2021cv01129
Defendant:
Police Officers John DOE 1-5, Montgomery County Department of Police, Chief of Police Marcus G. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Andres Quiceno Ferrara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pandora Jewelry LLC v. Does 1-10
as 1:2021cv00172
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Pandora Jewelry LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03578
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Collins v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2020cv03107
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety Correctional Service, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
