Cases 11 - 20 of 55
v. Talpalar et al
as 1:2022cv21876
Defendant:
Sharon Talpalar, tru Star Salon Services, LLC d/b/a Trustar Salon Services LLC, Goldwell of South Florida, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Trump v. Clinton et al
as 2:2022cv14101
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Trump
Defendant:
Hillary R. Clinton, HFACC, INC., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sanders v. Inch et al
as 2:2021cv00859
Plaintiff:
Barry Sanders
Defendant:
Secretary Mark S. Inch, ICT Board John Doe1, ICT Board John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE et al v. AUSTIN et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, I, JOHN 2 DOE, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant:
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, III, Secretary U.S. DHS Xavier Becerra, Secretary Air Force Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Doe, et al v. Richard Swearingen
as 21-10644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 5, JOHN DOE 2, JANE DOE, As Next Friend on Behalf of John Doe #6 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD L. SWEARINGEN
NUNEZ v. LEAVINS et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
MAXIE, JOHN DOE #20, BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN NUNOZ and JONATHAN NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONOVAN et al v. Doe I et al
as 1:2021cv20499
Plaintiff:
CHINEDU ERNESTO, CORTEZ NATHAN, BLAKE RATCLIFF and others
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 7, John Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustine v. Snyder et al
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant:
FNU Snyder, FNU Ashley, FNU Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Augustine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00214
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 19, JOHN DOE 21, BRIAN LEACH and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
