Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HARRIS v. OMEGA ENGINEERING, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RONDA HARRIS
Defendant:
OMEGA ENGINEERING, INC., MICHAEL BENJAMIN and JOHN DOE AGENTS, SERVANTS, AND EMPLOYEES 1-10 OF OMEGA ENGINEERING INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Daniel Richardson v. FBI
as 23-2433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL J. RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and JOHN DOE AGENTS, JMZ-0456, JTV-0031, KHK-4064, LFT-1319
ROSSI v. COMCAST et al
as 3:2023cv03549
Plaintiff:
JASON ROSSI
Defendant:
COMCAST, NADYA ROBERTS, JOHN DOE AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Richardson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Richardson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and John Doe Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brownlee v. A John Doe Agent of the Monroe County Children and Youth Agency
as 3:2019cv01534
Defendant:
A John Doe Agent of the Monrow County Children and Youth Agency and Monroe Co. CYS Melissa Snyder
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Brownlee, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. John Doe Agents
as 1:2017cv00400
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
John Doe Agents and Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCarthy v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
Ebbert, John Doe Agents and Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCarthy v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
Ebbert, Sussanne Heath and John Doe Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCarthy v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv00404
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
John E. Jones, Martin C. Carlson and John Doe Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCarthy v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
Ebbert and John Doe Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
