Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Texas State Board of Dental Examiners
Defendant:
John Doe, DDS and John Doe
Intervenor:
Enterhealth Properties, LLC
Dodd v. Doe DDS et al
as 3:2021cv00798
Defendant:
Wilson, John Doe DDS, Wilkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Dodd
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe DD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv02518
Defendant:
United States of America and Mark E. Wisner
Plaintiff:
John Doe DD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
NIBLACK v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE et al
as 2:2016cv01087
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, JEFFREY DICKERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cargotec OYJ v. MOL Ship Management, Co., Ltd.
as 14-1571
Plaintiff - Appellee:
POTENCIANO L. AGGARAO, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
CARGOTEC USA INCORPORATED, trading as Cargotec USA, a corporate fictitious name, CARGOTEC OYG, a Finnish public limited company, CARGOTEC SWEDEN, A.B., f/k/a MacGregor Group AB, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cargotec OYJ and others
Defendant:
CARGOTEC SWITZERLAND S.A., trading as Cargotec, a U.S. Registered Trademark (wordmark), MACGREGOR-NAVIRE INTERNATIONAL AB (SWEDEN), trading as MacGregor-Navire, a U.S. Registered Trademark (service mark), MACGREGOR-NAVIRE INTERNATIONAL AKTIEBOLAG JOINT STOCK COMPANY, trading as MacGregor-Navire, a U.S. Registered Trademark (wordmark) and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
WORLD CAR CARRIERS, INCORPORATED
Third Party Defendant:
MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LTD. and NISSAN MOTOR CAR CARRIER COMPANY, LTD.
Aggarao v. Cargotec USA Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02163
Plaintiff:
Potenciano L. Aggarao, Jr.
Defendant:
Cargotec USA Inc., Cargotec Switzerland S.A., MacGregor-Navire International AB (Sweden) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
