Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moreland et al v. Pal of Mine Corp., et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
ANDRA CHERI MORELAND, CIELO JEAN GIBSON, CLAUDIA SAMPEDRO and others
Defendant:
PAOLA CANAS, PAL OF MINE CORP. d/b/a CLUB EMPIRE, John Does I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Lanham Act
Doe I v. Medstar Health, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
John Doe I and Jane Doe I
Defendant:
MedStar Health, Inc and Cerner Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chawntel McCoy v. Correctional Officer Endicott
as 19-7621
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOES I-V, JOHN DOE, unknown person or persons, WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAWNTEL MCCOY
Thomas v. AMJ Recovery Service, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01115
Defendant:
John Does I-X, AMJ Recovery Service, Inc., Patrick K. Willis Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
