Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PATTERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03776
Plaintiff:
ANDRE PATTERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , DAVID CHISHOLM and JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS I-V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUMMINGS v. THE CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2015cv04504
Plaintiff:
REGINALD CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF CHESTER, ARTHUR GRENIER and CHESTER CITY JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS I-V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Metropolitan Police Department, City of St. Louis, et al.
as 4:2014cv02122
Plaintiff:
Saverla Johnson
Defendant:
Metropolitan Police Department, City of St. Louis , John Doe Police Officer I, John Doe Police Officer II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CATLETT v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
AMY K.Z. CATLETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, JOHN DOE NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPERS (I-X), JOHN DOE CALLER(S)/ INFORMANT(S) (I-V) and others
Cross_claimant:
DOMINIC DIORIO, M.D.
Cross_defendant:
ABC PARTNERSHIPS (I-X), CITY OF VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN DOE CALLER(S)/ INFORMANT(S) (I-V) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CATLETT v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
AMY K.Z. CATLETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE , JOHN DOE NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPERS (I-X), CITY OF VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cross_claimant:
DOMINIC DIORIO, M.D.
Cross_defendant:
ABC PARTNERSHIPS (I-X), CITY OF VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN DOE CALLER(S)/INFORMANT(S) (I-V) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05742
Plaintiff:
Tahji Jones
Defendant:
The City of New York , Ramu Hiller, John Doe Police Officers I-IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNMORE et al v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2007cv04438
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN DUNMORE, JOSEPH DUNMORE, RYAN DUNMORE and others
Defendant:
FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP, MATTHEW DECESARI, "JOHN DOE" POLICE OFFICERS I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
