Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cutright, et al v. Norfolk Southern, et al
as 1:2005cv00115
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth R Cutright, Tina Bevington, Jessica Curtis and others
Petitioner:
Christy T Dalton, Robert M Bell, Erwin J Leizerman and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, John Does 1 thru 10 and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Interested Party:
Douglas Schmidt
Not Classified By Court:
Barry Cook, Lewis Frye, Dana Younce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ferlito v. NCB Management Services et al
as 5:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Melanie B. Ferlito
Defendant:
NCB Management Services Incorporated and John Does 1 thru 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Buechler v. Burlage Hotel Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00444
Plaintiff:
James T. Buechler
Defendant:
Burlage Hotel Associates, LLC and John Doe 1 thru 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wince et al v. Easterbrooke Cellular Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wince, Joshua Wince, Joshua Wince and others
Defendant:
Easterbrooke Cellular Corporation, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, AT&T Mobility II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
