Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2021cv01346
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1-2 Controlling A Computer Network Thereby Injuring Plaintiff And Its Customers
as 1:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
John Does 1-2 Controlling A Computer Network Thereby Injuring Plaintiff And Its Customers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Maplebear Inc. v. Does 1-2
as 1:2021cv00474
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Plaintiff:
Maplebear Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Instacart
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2019cv01582
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Gryder et al v. The Common wealth of Virgina et al
as 1:2019cv01548
Defendant:
Courthouse Apartments Stafford, Scott Mayausky, Laura Rudy and others
Plaintiff:
Divina Gryder and Ken Gryder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2017cv01224
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Bradley et al v. Stupar et al
as 4:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Erick Bradley , Eboni Pruden Bradley , Shaheem Pruden and others
Defendant:
DEA Agent Michael S. Stupar, Unnamed DEA Agents John Doe 1, 2, 3, and 4, Joseph Jansson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2014cv01295
Plaintiff:
Syrita Morgan
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
