Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Carlos Thurman v. Cookie Crews, et al
as 24-5166
Plaintiff:
CARLOS L. THURMAN
Defendant:
COOKIE CREWS, Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, RANDY L. WHITE, Deputy Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, ALLYSON LAMBERT, Department of Corrections Ombudsman and others
Carlos Thurman v. Cookie Crews, et al
as 24-5154
Plaintiff:
CARLOS L. THURMAN
Defendant:
COOKIE CREWS, Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, RANDY L. WHITE, Deputy Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, ALLYSON LAMBERT, Department of Corrections Ombudsman and others
Dunn v. Rodriguez
as 23-3535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DUNN
Defendant / Appellee:
F. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer
Harrison v. Arnold et al
as 0:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Krystal Arnold, Zachary R. Parsons, P.A. Gregory Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24418
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUNN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thurman v. Crews et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Carlos Thurman
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Randy White, John Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Atlantic Track and Runway Services, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
Davevon Henderson
Defendant:
Atlantic Track and Runway Services, LLC, Rick Swope and John Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Asbell v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dale L. Asbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Anna Valentine, Philip Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
