Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01262
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03163
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02888
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02805
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANTRELL v. BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, SCOTT STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Durham et al
as 4:2023cv02638
Plaintiff:
John Eldridge Murphy
Defendant:
William Durham, Hal Ridley, Chris Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Chavelier et al
as 4:2023cv01600
Plaintiff:
John Elridge Murphy and John Eldridge Murphy
Defendant:
Warden Chavelier, Warden Strong, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Seminole County et al
as 6:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jamie C. Warner
Defendant:
Seminole County, Dennis Lemma, City of Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01436
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCURDY v. TOWN OF BRUNSWICK et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
PRESCOTT MCCURDY
Defendant:
TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, JOHN ELDRIDGE, OFFICER HODGDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
