Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03811
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BRACKEN et al v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BRACKEN , WILLIAM DEFORTE , WILLIAM JACKSON and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN, CHELSA WAGNER, JOHN FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00967
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JORDAN et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
LEE ROY JORDAN , RANDY WHITE , RAYFIELD WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brant v. Smeal et al
as 3:2009cv02410
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Brant
Defendant:
Paul K. Smeal, James W. Fouse, Jr., Medical Department/Staff for State Correctional Inst. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FITZGERALD et al v. KEITHLY
as 2:2008cv05187
Plaintiff:
JOHN FITZGERALD and JOANNE FITZGERALD
Defendant:
COLLETTE KEITHLY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MALARIK v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2008cv00576
Petitioner:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, KATIE WEEKS, JOHN FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALARIK v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2007cv00393
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL MALARIK
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, KATIE WEEKS, JOHN FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
