Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Schuh et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh and Adam S. Hamilton
Defendant:
Governor Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorton v. Hagan
as 3:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Michael Thornton
Defendant:
John Hagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner, I v. Walker et al
as 9:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Willi Free Garner, I
Defendant:
Steven Walker, Kenneth Montgomery, John Hagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Werner Rummer v. State of North Dakota, et al
as 16-1131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Werner Wolfgang Rummer
Defendant - Appellee:
State of North Dakota, ND Department of Corrections, ND State Penitentiary and others
Gordon v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Gordon
Defendant:
Leann K. Bertsch, Colby Braun, Don Redmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willoughby v. Hagan
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Willoughby
Defendant:
John Hagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dale Joseph Burke
Defendant:
North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeff Hostetter, Jean Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rummer v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 1:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Werner Wolfgang Rummer
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, ND Department of Corrections, ND State Penitentiary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. GORDAN et al
as 5:2009cv00304
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M TAYLOR
Defendant:
B GORDAN, JOHN HAGANS, MARK HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Moore v. Leann Bertsch, et al
as 09-2754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Moore
Defendant - Appellee:
Leann K. Bertsch, Timothy Schuetzle, Shaun Fode and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
