Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Parks v. Black et al
as 4:2017cv01453
Plaintiff:
Kyle Maurice Parks
Defendant:
Matthew Black, Richard G. Callahan, Howard Marcus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance Co.
as 14-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL CALDERON, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, MICHAEL HEADLEY, AARON KULSIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GEICO CORPORATION, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY and others
Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance Co.
as 14-2111
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAMUEL CALDERON, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, MICHAEL HEADLEY, AARON KULSIC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GEICO CORPORATION, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY and others
Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance Co
as 13-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL CALDERON, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, MICHAEL HEADLEY, AARON KULSIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GEICO CORPORATION, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY and others
Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance Co
as 13-2096
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAMUEL CALDERON, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, MICHAEL HEADLEY, AARON KULSIC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GEICO CORPORATION, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
