Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Romero v. Mueller et al
as 3:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Dakota John-Hawk Romero
Defendant:
Mueller, Polliak, Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. YELLIN et al
as 1:2023cv02519
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT RUBIN, CITIBANK, ALAN GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAWKES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07808
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAWKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LITTLE v. CENTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LITTLE
Defendant:
CENTER TOWNSHIP and JOHN HAWK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordon v. Doe et al
as 4:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Doe, Thompson, Beth Skinner and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08377
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAWK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derrick Daniels v. Brad Peterson, et al
as 19-2198
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle Waddle, Unit Manager, Adam Derr, Correctional Officer, John Hawk, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick Daniels
Edwards v. Whalen et al
as 4:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker, Douglas Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Peterson et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Adam Derr, John Hawk, Michelle Waddle and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Daniels
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bragg v. Kracht et al
as 4:2018cv00264
Defendant:
John Hawk, Adam Benda, Chris Tripp and others
Plaintiff:
Darvill Jimmy Joseph Bragg
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
